[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
CSLI Calendar, Correction
First a correction on a time and place. The special
AI-Vision-Robotics Division Colloquium on Friday will take place at
11:00am not 4:15pm and in Gates B12 not Gates 104.
FRIDAY, 8 MAY
11:00am AI-Vision-Robotics Division Colloquium
Gates B12
Exploiting Structure in Solving Planning Problems
or
Coping with the Blooming and Buzzing World that Surrounds
Us
Tom Dean
Brown University
special colloquium
Since I had to send this message out anyway, here are a few late
announcements
MONDAY, 11 May 1998
4:30pm Stanford Digital Libraries Seminar
Gates B08
Untangling Text Data Mining
Marti Hearst
Berkeley
Abstract below
TUESDAY, 11 MAY
4:15pm Logic Seminar
Room 380:381T
Reductions of Finite and Infinite Proofs
G. Mints
Stanford
Abstract below
FRIDAY, 15 MAY
12 noon Logic Lunch
Room 380:383N
Deconstructing Tarski's Semantics for Predicate Logic
or
Secret World of Decidable First-Order Logics
Johan van Benthem
Stanford and Amsterdam
Abstract below
____________
STANFORD DIGITAL LIBRARIES SEMINAR
on Monday, 11 May 1998, 4:30pm
Gates Building, B08
http://diglib.stanford.edu/diglib/seminars/seminars.html
Untangling Text Data Mining
Marti Hearst
UC Berkeley
The possibilities for data mining from large text collections are
virtually untapped. Text expresses a vast, rich range of information,
but encodes this information in a form that is difficult to decipher
automatically. For this reason, there has been little work on text
data mining to date. Furthermore, most people who have talked about
text data mining have either conflated it with information access or
have not made use of text directly.
In this talk I will define data mining, information access, and
corpus-based computational linguistics, and talk about the
relationship of these to text data mining. I will then provide
examples of what I think text data mining will really be about once
people actually start working on it. Caveat emptor: I have not done
any text data mining work myself to date, but may do so in future.
About the Speaker: Marti A. Hearst (hearst@sims.berkeley.edu) is an
assistant professor at SIMS (School of Information Management and
Systems) at the University of California, Berkeley. Her research
interests focus on the design and development of user interfaces and
robust language analysis for information access systems, and on
furthering our understanding of how people use and understand such
systems. She is an associate editor for ACM Transactions on Office
Information Systems and edits the Trends and Controversies feature for
IEEE Intelligent Systems. She received her PhD in computer science
from UC Berkeley in 1994.
____________
LOGIC SEMINAR
on Tuesday, 12 May 1998, 4:15pm
Math Corner 380:381T (or 383N)
http://www-logic.stanford.edu/seminars.html
Reductions of Finite and Infinite Proofs
G. Mints
Stanford
Standard expansion of a finite proof d into an infinite proof h(d) was
a basis of many "extensional" proof-theoretic results, for example
ordinal bounds. A slight change of this expansion allows to obtain
also intensional results like normalization theorems or connections
between finite and infinite reductions.
____________
LOGIC LUNCH
on Friday, 15 May 1998, 12 noon
Math Corner 380:383N
http://www-logic.stanford.edu/seminars.html
Deconstructing Tarski's Semantics for Predicate Logic
or
Secret World of Decidable First-Order Logics
Johan van Benthem
Stanford and Amsterdam
First-order predicate logic is the general-duty tool of modern
logic. Its syntax, semantics, and metatheory are well-known, and form
the backbone of standard textbooks. But a price has to be paid for
this broad applicability. This basic tool of the logician is
undecidable, contrary to what many founding fathers may have
expected. But is the price inevitable? Could things have gone
differently?
Returning to an earlier lunch presentation, we'll show how to analyze
'standard Tarski semantics' into a number of independent decisions,
the conjunction of which leads to undecidability. Other choices turn
out to generate a landscape of decidable 'predicate logics'. This
insight needs no more, essentially, than a fresh closer look at what
students naturally do when they show that certain predicate-logical
principles are 'valid'. We'll survey some of the current technical
theory in this area. We'll also discuss briefly what this
deconstruction means for the usual monolithic view of 'standard
logical systems'.
Literature
J. van Benthem, 1996, "Exploring Logical Dynamics", Chapter 9, CSLI
Publications, Stanford & Cambridge University Press.
M. Marx & Y. Venema, 1996, "Multi-Dimensional Modal Logic", Kluwer
Logic Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.