[Prev][Next][Index]

CSLI Calendar, 2 November 1989, vol. 5:7




       C S L I   C A L E N D A R   O F   P U B L I C   E V E N T S
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 November 1989                    Stanford                     Vol. 5, No. 7
_____________________________________________________________________________

    A weekly publication of the Center for the Study of Language and
Information (CSLI), Ventura Hall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4115
			     ____________

	  CSLI ACTIVITIES FOR THIS THURSDAY, 2 NOVEMBER 1989

12:00 noon		TINLunch
      Cordura 100	Local Prepositions and the Syntax-Semantics
			Relationship
			Dieter Wunderlich
			University of Duesseldorf
			(dieter@csli)
			Abstract below
			
 2:15 p.m.		CSLI Seminar
      Cordura 100	Models of Rational Agency 6
			Michael Bratman, Martha Pollack, Stan Rosenschein
			(bratman@csli.stanford.edu, 
			pollack@warbucks.ai.sri.com, stan@teleos.com)
			Speaker: Yoav Shoham
			(shoham@score.stanford.edu)
			Abstract in last week's Calendar
			     ____________

	  CSLI ACTIVITIES FOR NEXT THURSDAY, 9 NOVEMBER 1989

12:00 noon		TINLunch
      Cordura 100	Empirical Studies of the Role of Notation
			in Program Development
			Elin Roenby Pedersen
			Department of Computer and Systems Sciences
			Copenhagen School of Business and Administration
			(elin@csli.stanford.edu)
			Abstract below

 2:15 p.m.		CSLI Seminar
      Cordura 100	Models of Rational Agency 7
			Michael Bratman, Martha Pollack, Stan Rosenschein
			(bratman@csli.stanford.edu, 
			pollack@warbucks.ai.sri.com, stan@teleos.com)
			Speaker: Phil Cohen
			(pcohen@ai.sri.com)
			Abstract in next week's Calendar
			     ____________

			 THIS WEEK'S TINLUNCH
       Local Prepositions and the Syntax-Semantics Relationship
			  Dieter Wunderlich

1. Some assumptions about compositionality and the structure of
   lexical entries: The theta-grid as an interface between semantics
   and syntax. 

2. On the predicative nature of prepositional phrases.

3. Attributes and adverbials as syntactic parasites: On the conflict
   between X-bar theory and categorial grammar, and its solution.

4. Prepositional phrases as arguments: On transferred and incorporated
   predicates.  (What, e.g., is the proper lexical entry of verbs such
   as "put"?) 

5. Data from word order in German as syntactic evidence for
   predicate incorporation: Why must predicative theta-roles be
   discharged first? 

6. Data from prefixed verbs in German as morphological evidence
   for predicate incorporation: On diathesis and functional
   composition in the prefixed verbs of German.
			     ____________

			 NEXT WEEK'S TINLUNCH
	      Empirical Studies of the Role of Notation
			in Program Development
			 Elin Roenby Pedersen

In my talk, I shall describe a series of empirical studies of the role
of "notation" in program development.  The studies resulted in the
development of a view of notation as aspects of linguistic practice
and knowledge that are concerned with the psychological phonomenon of
"encircling modes of description."  This view of notation differs from
earlier concepts of it, e.g., as some system of representation that the
author and the reader are supposed to be using, whether consciously or
unconsciously, or as some system that lies intrinsically beneath
texts.
			     ____________

		  MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT COLLOQUIUM
	The Riemann Hypothesis from a Logician's Point of View
			  Yuri Matijasevitch
	  Steklov Institute of Mathematics, Leningrad, USSR
	   Thursday, 2 November, 4:15, 380-380W (basement)

No abstract available.  Tea will be served before the colloquium, at
3:30, in the third-floor lounge of the mathematics department, room 383N.
			     ____________

		   PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT COLLOQUIUM
		    Bell's Theorem: What It Takes
			  Jeremy Butterfield
		 Jesus College, Cambridge University
		   visiting at Princeton University
		   Friday, 3 November, 3:15, 90-91A

No abstract available.
			     ____________

		MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT SPECIAL SEMINAR
	    Exponential Diophantine Equations as Computers
			  Yuri Matijasevitch
	  Steklov Institute of Mathematics, Leningrad, USSR
		  Friday, 3 November, 4:15, 380-383N

No abstract available.
			     ____________

	    COMMONSENSE AND NONMONOTONIC REASONING SEMINAR
		      Autoepistemic Modal Logics
			   Grigory Shvarts
		      Program Systems Institute
		   of the USSR Academy of Sciences
		       Pereslavl-Zalessky, USSR
		       Monday, 6 November, 3:15
		       Margaret Jacks Hall 252

A modal approach to nonmonotonic reasoning was proposed by Drew
McDermott and Jon Doyle in 1980-82.  Almost immediately, some
disadvantages of that approach were pointed out.  Robert Moore (1983)
proposed his autoepistemic logic, which overcomes these difficulties.
Later, some authors (Kurt Konolige, Paul Morris, and others) found
peculiarities of different kinds in Moore's logic and proposed rather
complicated solutions to these problems.

A careful mathematical analysis of Moore's and McDermott's approaches
shows that Moore's logic is merely a special case of McDermott's
logic, at least formally.  The problems that arose in Moore's logic
may find a simple and uniform solution by coming back to McDermott's
original concept.
			     ____________

		SEMINAR ON COMPUTERS, DESIGN, AND WORK
	 Work-Mapping Analysis for Design of Computer Support
		   Terry Winograd and Finn Kensing
       (winograd@csli.stanford.edu, kensing@csli.stanford.edu)
	       Wednesday, 8 November, 12:15, Ventura 17

We are developing a methodology for systematically observing and
analyzing work patterns, including but not limited to computer-based
work.  The resulting analysis is intended as the basis for proposing
and designing computer-based support systems and the reorganization
they will bring to the work.  We have developed a framework for
analysis, based on the language/action perspective, which focuses on
the communicative activities of the work participants, identifying
recurrent patterns of conversation and the associated patterns of
breakdown.  We are planning to do a first field study using this
framework later in November.

In this presentation, we will describe the analysis framework within
the context of the overall methodology and seek help from the
attendees in improving it as we get ready to put it into practice.
Later in the quarter, we plan to give another seminar describing what
happens when the theory meets the real world.