[Prev][Next][Index]
Newsletter July 4, No. 36
-
Subject: Newsletter July 4, No. 36
-
From: csli@csli.stanford.edu
-
Date: Wed 3 Jul 1985 16:58:09-PDT
C S L I N E W S L E T T E R
_____________________________________________________________________________
July 4, 1985 Stanford Vol. 2, No. 36
_____________________________________________________________________________
A weekly publication of The Center for the Study of Language and
Information, Ventura Hall, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
____________
ANNOUNCEMENT
This Thursday, July 4, is a National Holiday and no activities will
take place. No activities will take place on Thursday, July 11.
____________
AREA P1 MEETING: PIXELS AND PREDICATES
``The Bitmap as Reality''
Scott Kim, author of ``Inversions''
3:00 pm, Wednesday July 10, Ventura Seminar room
What would a truly graphic computer be like? Not just an iconic
veneer on an underlying textual representation, but rather a system in
which everything would be pictorial. ``Viewpoint'' is a computer
system that demonstrates my approach to this question. In Viewpoint
there is no underlying representation lurking behind the screen --
what you see is what you AND the computer get. As consequences of this
radical viewpoint, text and graphics can be treated homogeneously,
bitmap-oriented and structured drawing systems can be truly
integrated, and other graphic media such as paper and videodisks can
be incorporated in computer-based communication.
____________
AREA NL2 MEETING: INTERACTIONS OF MORPHOLOGY, SYNTAX, AND DISCOURSE
On June 26, the Working Group on Interactions of Morphology,
Syntax, and Discourse had its first meeting, and Bresnan and Mchombo's
``Agreement and Pronominal Incorporation in Chichewa'' was discussed.
This group will hold closed meetings throughout the Summer, but the
results of the research will be presented in the Fall, and summaries
will be printed in the Newsletter.
SUMMARY OF THE FIRST MEETING
In Bantu languages, there are highly systematic interactions
between word structure, word order, and discourse structure. Although
these interactions are well known among Bantuists, it is not
recognized in general that they pose deep problems for current
linguistic theory. These interactions are problematic because words,
phrases, and discourses are independent systems in their grammatical
form; yet, despite the autonomy of their structural formation, they
are functionally interdependent to a high degree. How then does
functional information flow between word, phrase, and discourse? The
answer to this question suggests a radically different conception of
the organization of linguistic information fromt that which has been
prevalent in generative grammar. --Joan Bresnan
-------